Skip to content

9/11: Explosives Evidence – CIA Warned Bush Administration Before 9/11 – Jesse Ventura Conspiracy Theory 9/11 Twin Towers – Al Qaeda Now US Ally in Syria

September 12, 2012

9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out

New DARPA Robot Can Autonomously Track People

Al-Qaeda now a US ally in Syria

Gun Grab: Obama Justice Department Ends Due Process



Report: They Knew It Was Coming: June 29, 2001: “Major Casualties”; “Dramatic Consequences”; “Imminent Threat” ; “Will Occur Soon”

  • The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Twitter Alex Jones' Facebook Infowars store

Mac Slavo
Sept 12, 2012

The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.

Project for a New American Century – Rebuilding America’s Defenses (September 2000)  [link]

Prepared, in Part, By :  Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Former Vice President Dick Cheney, President of the World Bank Paul Wolfowitz

Over a decade after the largest domestic attack in U.S. history, there are still many unanswered questions about what happened on September 11, 2001 and why.

While the Bush administration denied that they could have possibly seen such an event coming, a disclosure of CIA documents reveals that they did, in fact, have foreknowledge that a major attack was in its final planning stages, and that it would be coordinated and large-scale attack with major casualties.

Was the Bush Administration incompetent in its handling of intelligence that was warning of an imminent attack, or were there bigger forces at play?

The direct warnings to Mr. Bush about the possibility of a Qaeda attack began in the spring of 2001. By May 1, the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation. Weeks later, on June 22, the daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be “imminent,” although intelligence suggested the time frame was flexible.

And the C.I.A. repeated the warnings in the briefs that followed. Operatives connected to Bin Laden, one reported on June 29, expected the planned near-term attacks to have “dramatic consequences,” including major casualties. On July 1, the brief stated that the operation had been delayed, but “will occur soon.” Some of the briefs again reminded Mr. Bush that the attack timing was flexible, and that, despite any perceived delay, the planned assault was on track.

Yet, the White House failed to take significant action. Officials at the Counterterrorism Center of the C.I.A. grew apoplectic. On July 9, at a meeting of the counterterrorism group, one official suggested that the staff put in for a transfer so that somebody else would be responsible when the attack took place, two people who were there told me in interviews. The suggestion was batted down, they said, because there would be no time to train anyone else.

In the aftermath of 9/11, Bush officials attempted to deflect criticism that they had ignored C.I.A. warnings by saying they had not been told when and where the attack would occur. That is true, as far as it goes, but it misses the point. Throughout that summer, there were events that might have exposed the plans, had the government been on high alert. Indeed, even as the Aug. 6 brief was being prepared, Mohamed al-Kahtani, a Saudi believed to have been assigned a role in the 9/11 attacks, was stopped at an airport in Orlando, Fla., by a suspicious customs agent and sent back overseas on Aug. 4. Two weeks later, another co-conspirator, Zacarias Moussaoui, was arrested on immigration charges in Minnesota after arousing suspicions at a flight school. But the dots were not connected, and Washington did not react.

Could the 9/11 attack have been stopped, had the Bush team reacted with urgency to the warnings contained in all of those daily briefs? We can’t ever know. And that may be the most agonizing reality of all.

Source: NY Times

The September 11th attacks directly led to the tragic deaths of over 3,500 Americans. At the time it would have been impossible for most people to fathom the implications it would have on everyday life in America – and the world.

Over a decade on, when looking in hindsight, a much sharper picture emerges.

Though conspiratorial in nature, one can’t ignore the fact that key players in the Bush Administration had, just a year before, developed a document [pdf] that discussed the centralization of government power, expansion of military influence (domestically and abroad), management of the internet and cyberspace, and the expansion of American hegemony to all resource-rich corners of the Earth.

While the plan was always to “rebuild America,” without a catalyzing event as a pretext the transofrmation of could have taken many decades.

September 11th fast-tracked that fundamental transformation and allowed President Bush, and then his successor President Obama, to initiate a blanket of security directives, military action and domestic legislation that would have been unheard of previously.

In addition to being used as a pre-text to deploy the United States military in force across nearly the whole of the middle east, the blowback has enveloped every aspect of American life from the way we travel and communicate, to how we engage in commerce and behave in society.

By all accounts, we are less free today than we were before September of 2011, and one can’t ignore that it was this single event that triggered the many geo-political and social machinations of the last ten years.

Stopping short of suggesting that President Bush, the US military, and national intelligence agencies were all “in on it,” is it out of the question to suggest that someone, somewhere – perhaps a conglomeration of elite global political and business interests – may have taken steps to let these events play out in the hopes that it would allow for a more rapid expansion and coming to fruition of ideas and ideals that were outlined in the Project for a New American Century and other initiatives?

While unimaginable for the majority of the people of this planet, some of those in the upper echelons of the global power structure live by a different set of rules and have goals that we may never be fully privvy to.

It’s happened throughout history, why should we believe without question that it can’t – or hasn’t – happened to us?


Facebook issues ‘mental health’ warning to CLG editor over posts

September 10, 2012 by legitgov

ShareThisFacebook issues ‘mental health’ warning to CLG editor over posts –‘You’re receiving this message because a friend is concerned about something you posted on Facebook.’ By Lori Price, 11 Sep 2012 On Monday, I received a ‘substance abuse’ warning email from Facebook. The CLG Facebook page has over 4,200 ‘likes’ and frequently includes ‘9/11 inside job’ commentary. A trace of the email header indicates that the email was actually from Facebook. The email is posted below. [Hey, Zuckerberg: I don’t need ‘Psychology Today.’ I need a real investigation into the pre-9/11 put options, why Building 7 fell after the BBC reported its collapse following the command given by ‘Lucky’ Larry Silverstein to ‘pull’ it.]

This is not my first tango with Facebook. In February, I was forced to change my profile name. Facebook Disables CLG Editor’s Account Name, Claiming It Is ‘Illegitimate’ –‘The name you entered was not approved by our system.’ 17 Feb 2012 Facebook has decided that ‘Lori Price Legitgov,’ the personal Facebook account title of the Editor-in-Chief of Citizens for Legitimate Government, is (suddenly) not ‘legitimate’ and therefore disabled. Price’s Facebook account was established in September 2007 as ‘Lori Price Legitgov,’ and she never received any notifications or warnings from Facebook regarding the account. The official page for Citizens for Legitimate Government was not affected.

Update: On September 11, Facebook would *not allow me access* until I checked a box on a pop-up to acknowledge their ‘substance abuse warning,’ purportedly issued due to the ‘nature’ of my posts. The message was identical to the email I received from Facebook below, with this additional wording: ‘I have read the message above,’ and a box which had to be checked in order to access my account.

—– Original Message —–
From: “Facebook” <>
To: <lori at legitgov dot org>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 8:36 AM
Subject: Facebook Warning


You’re receiving this message because a friend is concerned about something you posted on Facebook. Facebook is working with the the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) to provide resources and support for those who may be struggling with substance abuse.

You can contact the SAMHSA’s National Helpline at 1-800-662-HELP (4357) or 1-800-487-4889 (TDD), where help is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. The Helpline provides free and confidential information and treatment referrals, in English and Spanish.

SAMHSA also offers a Treatment Facility Locator (, which provides a comprehensive listing of drug and alcohol treatment programs across the United States.

To learn more about SAMHSA, please visit

You can also find support through resources like Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous, and Psychology Today’s online listing of counselors and therapists.

Note that we provide these resources whenever this type of content is reported to us.

The Facebook Team [Yes, The Facebook Team: NSA, CIA, DHS, FBI, DOD, DARPA, and Facebook.]

*****Here is a portion of the email header:

Return-Path: <>
X-Original-To: lori at [redacted info]
Received: from ( [])
X-Facebook: from zuckmail ([MTI3LjAuMC4x])
by with HTTP (ZuckMail);
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 05:36:13 -0700
Subject: Facebook Warning
X-Mailer: ZuckMail [version 1.00]

Facebook Pwned by US Government


No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: