Skip to content

Just a Shotgun – Christopher Monckton: UN Rio+20 Failed – Parasite Tied to Suicide Attempts

July 7, 2012

Lord Monckton: Marxist Green “Religion” Propaganda at UN Rio+20 Failed

Army Course Manual Trains Soldiers to Confiscate Constitutionally-protected Firearms

Parasite tied to self-harm, suicide attempts


Just a Shotgun

You’re  sound asleep when you hear a thump  outside your bedroom door.

Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with  fear, you hear  muffled whispers.

At least  two people have broken into your  house  and are moving your  way.

With your heart pumping, you reach down
beside  your bed and pick up your shotgun.
You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it.

In the  darkness, you make out two  shadows.

One holds  something that looks like a  crowbar.

When the  intruder brandishes it as if to  strike, you raise  the shotgun and fire.

The blast  knocks both thugs to the  floor.

One  writhes and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside.

As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you’re in trouble.

In your  country, most guns were outlawed  years before,  and the few that are privately  owned are so  stringently regulated as to make them  useless..

Yours  was never registered.
Police  arrive and inform you that the  second burglar has  died.

They  arrest you for First Degree Murder
and  Illegal Possession of a  Firearm.

When you  talk to your attorney, he  tells
you not to  worry: authorities will  probably
plea  the case down to  manslaughter.

“What kind  of sentence will I get?” you ask.

“Only  ten-to-twelve years,”
he  replies, as if that’s  nothing.

“Behave  yourself, and you’ll be out in  seven.”

The next  day, the shooting is the  lead story in the local newspaper.

Somehow,  you’re portrayed as an  eccentric vigilante  while the two men you shot are  represented as  choirboys.

Their  friends and relatives can’t find an unkind  word to say about  them..

Buried  deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both “victims” have been arrested numerous  times.

But  the next day’s headline says it  all:

“Lovable Rogue Son Didn’t Deserve to  Die.”

The  thieves have been transformed from career  criminals into Robin Hood-type  pranksters..

As  the days wear on, the story take wings.

The  national media picks it  up, then the  international media.

The  surviving burglar has  become a folk hero.

Your  attorney says the thief is  preparing
to  sue you, and he’ll probably win.

The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several times in the past and that you’ve been critical of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the  suspects.

After the  last break-in, you told your  neighbor that you would be prepared next  time.

The  District Attorney uses this to allege
that you  were lying in wait for the burglars.

A few  months later, you go to  trial.

The charges haven’t been reduced, as your  lawyer had so confidently  predicted.

When  you take the stand, your anger at the  injustice of it all works against  you..

Prosecutors  paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful man.

It  doesn’t take long for the jury to  convict
you of all  charges.

The judge  sentences you to life in  prison.

This case  really happened.

On August  22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk,  England, killed one burglar and wounded a  second.

In  April, 2000, he was  convicted and  is now serving a life  term…

How did it  become a crime to defend one’s own life  in the once great British Empire  ?

It started  with the Pistols Act of  1903.

This  seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols  to minors or felons and established that handgun  sales were to be made only to those who had a license.

The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns..

Later laws  passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns.

Momentum  for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerford mass shooting in 1987.

Michael  Ryan, a mentally disturbed man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets  shooting everyone he saw.

When the  smoke cleared, 17 people were  dead.

The  British public, already de-sensitized by eighty  years of “gun control”, demanded even tougher  restrictions.

(The seizure of all privately  owned handguns was the objective even though  Ryan used a rifle.)

Nine years  later, at Dunblane, Scotland,
Thomas  Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public  school.

For many  years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as  mentally unstable, or worse, criminals.

Now  the press had a real kook with which to beat up  law-abiding gun owners.

Day after day, week  after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all  handguns.

The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months  later, sealed the fate of the few sidearms still  owned by private citizens.

During the  years in which the British government  incrementally took away most gun rights, the  notion that a citizen had the right to armed  self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism.

Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to  people who were threatened, claiming that  self-defense was no longer considered a reason  to own a gun.

Citizens who shot burglars  or robbers or rapists were charged while the  real criminals were  released.

Indeed,  after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman  was quoted as saying,

“We cannot have people take the law into their own  hands.”

All of  Martin’s neighbors had been robbed numerous  times, and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences.

Martin himself, a collector of antiques,
had seen most of his collection trashed  or stolen by burglars.

When the  Dunblane Inquiry ended,
citizens who owned  handguns were given three months to turn  them over to local  authorities.

Being  good British subjects,
most people obeyed  the law.
The few who didn’t were visited by  police
and threatened with ten-year prison  sentences if they didn’t  comply.

Police  later bragged that they’d taken
nearly  200,000 handguns from private  citizens.

How did  the authorities know who had handguns?

The  guns had been registered and licensed.

Kind  of like cars. Sound  familiar?



“…It  does not require a majority to prevail, but  rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set  brush fires in people’s  minds..”

Samuel  Adams

If you  think this is important, please forward to everyone you  know.

You had  better wake up, because  Obama  is doing this  very same thing, over here, if he can  get it done.

And there  are stupid people in congress and on  the street that will go right along with  him.

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: