Skip to content

FBI Insider on the Dubious Terror Plot – Pepe Escobar: Iranian Plot an Inside Job – UN Exaggerates Extreme Weather – OKC Body Count

October 13, 2011

FBI Insider: Obama Administration Likely Manufactured Dubious Terror Plot

  • The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones' Facebook Infowars store

No information about plot exists within FBI channels

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Wednesday, October 13, 2011

Retired U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Shaffer says that an FBI insider told him the dubious terror plot to assassinate a Saudi ambassador which has been blamed on Iran was likely manufactured by the Obama administration, because no information about the plot even exists within FBI channels.

The plot, an assassination attempt against Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the United States, Adel al-Jubeir, was pinned on an Iranian-American used-car salesman from Texas and subsequently linked by the Obama administration to a wider conspiracy controlled by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.

According to the administration, used car salesman Mansour J. Arbabsiar tried to hire assassins from a Mexican drug gang to carry out the murder, but the head of the drug gang turned out to be a DEA agent posing as a Mexican Los Zetas gangster. The story has all the hallmarks of classic FBI entrapment tactics that have characterized almost every major terror bust in recent times.

Having personally interrogated Iranians, Shaffer doubted the fact that members of the elite Quds Force would risk carrying out an assassination in the United States when it would be far easier to conduct such a plot in the middle east.

“It does not smell correctly,” Shaffer told Fox Business host Andrew Napolitano, adding that it was doubtful a successful used car salesman who has been part of the community for 15 years would suddenly become embroiled in an international assassination plot.

Asked by Napolitano if Arbabsiar was the victim of another FBI sting, Shaffer responded, “I think that’s part of it.”

“The FBI’s had a record lately and I did talk to one of my inside guys and he is saying he thinks the same thing, you know why, because he can’t find any real information and he’s got a clearance – so that tells him that there’s something going on that’s extraordinary by the fact that he’s an inside investigator, knows what’s going on and yet, I’m gonna quote here, ‘There’s nothing on this within the DOJ beyond what they’ve talked about publicly’ – which means to him that there’s something very wrong with it,” said Shaffer.

Even the New York Times is now reporting that the dubious nature of the plot has caused “a wave of puzzlement and skepticism from some foreign leaders and outside experts.”

The military-industrial complex has long been searching for a pretext that could be used to justify military strikes against Iran.

In a 2009 report entitled “Which Path to Persia?”, the elitist Brookings Institution wrote, “It would be far more preferable if the United States could cite an Iranian provocation as justification for the airstrikes before launching them. Clearly, the more outrageous, the more deadly, and the more unprovoked the Iranian action, the better off the United States would be.”

The dubious plot has been instantly seized upon by the likes of Hillary Clinton and John Kerry to push for Iran to be further isolated by the international community. Kerry’s comments were perhaps the most bellicose, telling reporters yesterday, “I don’t think anything should be taken off the table at this point in time.”

It has also served as a useful distraction for Attorney General Eric Holder, who is currently under investigation for his role in the infamous Fast and Furious program, which saw the federal government deliver thousands of military-grade weapons to leaders of Mexican drug gangs.

“That the current “alleged” plot pinned on Iran revolves around yet another undercover federal agency conducting a long-term sting operation defies belief,” writes Tony Cartalucci. “That we are expected to believe one of Iran’s most elite military forces left such a sensitive, potentially war-starting operation to a used-car salesman and a drug gang reported in the papers daily for its involvement with US government agencies (and who turns out to actually be undercover DEA agents) is so ridiculous it can only be “made up” as Secretary Clinton puts it. More accurately, it is the result of an impotent US intelligence community incapable of contriving anything more convincing in the face of an ever awakening American public, to bolster its morally destitute agenda. The cartoonish nature of the plot and the arms’ length even its proponents treat it with to maintain plausible deniability is indicative of a dangerously out of control ruling elite and an utterly incompetent, criminally insane government.”

———————————————————————————–

Pepe Escobar: Iranian plot was an inside job

  • The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones' Facebook Infowars store

RT
Thursday, October 13, 2011

A US government informant acting as a member of the Zetas, a drug cartel in Mexico, helped thwart an Iranian plot to assassinate the Saudi Arabian ambassador to the United States on American soil. Now Obama’s top national security aides are seeking new international sanctions against Iran. Pepe Escobar, correspondent for the Asia Times, tells us who’s to gain from the situation.

——————————————————————————-

Iranian Terror “Mastermind” Described as Drunk, Pothead, Hooker Frequenting “Joke”

——————————————————————————-

UN Exaggerates Extreme Weather

| Print |  
Written by Rebecca Terrell   –   New American
Thursday, 13 October 2011 09:35
The UN’s list of climate-change tricks continues to grow with news this week from the World Climate Report. It accuses the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of predicting exaggerated risks of extreme weather attributed to anthropogenic global warming (AGW).In its 2007 Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), IPCC made the claim that “intense precipitation events” have been increasing in severity across more than half of the globe since 1950. It based the finding on a method called the fixed bin approach, which categorizes average daily rainfall into ranges or “bins” (e.g., one-half to one inch, one to two inches, or more than two inches) and ranks these bins as a percentile of all precipitation events.However, when used to determine trends in annual precipitation, the fixed bin method can produce false results indicating extremely severe storms that were not actually so harsh. Long before AR4’s publication, researchers with the University of Virginia, the University of Colorado, the Cato Institute, and New Hope Environmental Services exposed fixed bin flaws in the 2004 International Journal of Climatology.

They demonstrated how the fixed bin method can erroneously reveal an “increase in total annual rainfall … disproportionately occurring on the wettest days.” This is because extreme weather naturally contributes more rain than light showers do. Considered in terms of annual precipitation and an overall increase in rainfall, fixed bin can make conditions seem as though bad storms are getting worse.

The authors used several examples of actual rainfall measurements in the United States wherein total precipitation increases were brought about by entirely proportionate weather events. They also proposed a more foolproof method of characterizing precipitation increases.

Yet the IPCC chose to ignore the fact its methodology is faulty and spurned the proven approach. AR4 authors used fixed bin and assumed all events with high amounts of precipitation to be out of proportion with “normal” weather. AR4 leads readers to believe extreme weather events are on the rise, all due to AGW. (The natural assumption is a risk to human life, though deaths from extreme weather events worldwide have actually plummeted in the past 100 years.)

The fixed bin snafu is important for two reasons. First, many governments worldwide, including our own, have used AR4 to frame their public environmental policies. Industry is crippled, tax dollars are thrown away on fruitless “alternative” energy scams, and fuel costs are soaring due to bogus claims in IPCC assessment reports.

Second, this latest fib adds to the ever-growing list of problems with AR4 and further calls into question the scientific credibility of its authors. Consider these whoppers:

  1. AR4 claims massive Himalayan glaciers will shrink to extinction by 2035. This was later exposed as idle speculation by a lone glaciologist who works for an energy research institute dedicated to studying the effects of AGW.
  2. More than half of The Netherlands is below sea level, warns AR4, and is in imminent danger of floods due to melting polar ice caps. Though the Dutch Environment Ministry announced a correction, IPCC never edited its report.
  3. According to AR4, grassland will soon replace the Amazon jungle because of rainfall disruptions and forest fires. IPCC gleaned the information from a World Wildlife Fund promotional piece published in 2000.
  4. IPCC authors discarded temperatures from China and cherry-picked Russian measurements. The resulting corrupt data indicates global warming when temperatures were actually quite stable.

Interestingly, one of the scientists who determined AR4’s “conceptual basis for changes in precipitation” (i.e., the fixed bin method) was Kevin Trenberth, head of climate analysis at Colorado’s federally funded National Center for Atmospheric Research. He is famous for his Climategate e-mail admission, made while working on the IPCC report: “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.”

Trenberth was one of two lead authors of the AR4 chapter on precipitation. The other was Philip Jones, a professor of climatology at the University of East Anglia in Britain where the Climategate e-mails were pirated. The correspondence implicated Jones conspiring to thwart a Freedom of Information request by asking his colleagues to “delete any e-mail you may have had … re AR4.” He also planned to deceitfully exclude scientific research that questioned the link between human activities and global warming. “I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report,” wrote Jones in an e-mail labeled HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL. “Kevin [Trenberth] and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!” (Was the fixed bin research on his blacklist?)

Currently, scientists are hard at work on IPCC’s next assessment report, AR5, due for publication in 2013. Trenberth is listed among the authors, but Jones did not make the cut this time around.

——————————————————————————

Comment: This is an old article but worthy of attention.  This government crime is still unsolved and some of the players are still at large conducting criminal acts.  Did you know Eric Holder was involved with the OKC cover up?

 NEWS ARTICLES

Growing Body Count Of
OKC Bombing Witnesses
Who Knew Too Much

From Discovery Channel Online
http://www.discovery.com
7-24-98

Hot on the heels of the latest information about the apparent treachery of the FBI, in regard to the TWA-800 SHOOTDOWN (and coverup), comes allegations of murders of several Oklahoma City Bombing survivors, particularly emergency workers present shortly after the blast.

Who would want to murder those emergency workers (including policemen)? If those emergency workers had become aware of information that the bombing was engineered by FBI, BATF and DEA agents, well, then the question sort of answers itself.

How does this relate to the 100+ BLAST SHELTERS that FEMA has been building all over the United States? If the information described in the article below is in fact accurate, the implications go FAR BEYOND some “building demolition” and a few witness murders. The entire situation might have been engineered to misdirect public attention toward large reductions of freedoms and constitutional rights. It would help prepare people for a more dictatorial government, that needs to violate rights “for the common good”. Who would ultimately be in control of this government is itself an interesting topic.

Clearly, any of the OKC bombing emergency workers who believe they have something to say, had better do so soon, to a wide audience, while they still can.

Unresolved Death In Oklahoma By Michael A. O’Camb For Immediate Distribution 7-24-98

In the first minutes and hours following the blasts that devastated the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in downtown Oklahoma City, the morning of April 19, 1995, a number of selfless individuals risked life and limb to rescue many of the victims. Among them were Oklahoma City police officers, Terrance Yeakey, Gordon Martin and Ken Griffin, a number of Oklahoma City firefighters, Dr. H. Don Chumley, G.S.A. employee Mike Loudenslager and others.

In the aftermath of the “bombing” the name Mike Loudenslager holds particular significance in the hearts of many families in and around Oklahoma City. And this is so, because of the forewarning he gave to a number of those who had children in the Murrah Building’s day-care center. In the weeks preceding the bombing, G.S.A. employee, Michael Loudenslager, 48, became increasingly aware that large amounts of ordnance and explosives were in the building and strongly urged (along with the operator of the day-care center) a number of parents to take their children out of the Murrah Building.

This situation arose after other employees became concerned with an increased amount of ordnance (missiles) being brought into the building by the B.A.T.F. and D.E.A. As a result of this concern, a grievance was filed with G.S.A. by the building’s security director. The result was, the man who had complained lost his job there. Then, after the operator of the day-care center (the security director’s wife) notified the fire marshals after some remodeling had been done (as her license required her to do), the fire marshals were denied access to do their inspection by federal agents and told to leave! And the day-care operator lost her contract.

As a result of this (fearing the worst with all the talk around town of a possible bombing), Mike Loudenslager and the day-care center operator then told many of the parents to get their children out. And, because of their warnings, far fewer children were in the day-care center on that horrible Wednesday morning than there otherwise would have been. A number of families, in and around Oklahoma City, have these two people to thank for their children’s lives today.

Shortly after the bombing, Michael Loudenslager was actively helping in the rescue and recovery effort. A large number of those at the bomb-site either saw or talked with him. During the course of the early rescue efforts, however, Mike Loudenslager was seen and heard in a very “heated” confrontation with someone (there). Much of his anger stemmed from the fact he felt the B.A.T.F. was in large part responsible not only for the bombing, but for the death and inury to those inside, including all the children.

To the absolute astonishment of a large number of police officers and rescue workers, it was later reported that G.S.A. employee Mike Loudenslager’s body had been found inside the Murrah Building the following Sunday, still at his desk, a victim of the 9:02 A.M. bombing! This, mind you, after he’d already been seen alive and well by numerous rescue workers at the bomb-site AFTER the bombing! He is also officially listed as one of the 168 bombing fatalities.

The question now becomes: Was he murdered and placed at his desk by federal agents? Or was he just simply murdered by them and SAID to have been found at his desk? Access to the inside of the building, from shortly after the bombing onward was extremely limited to nearly all but federal employees by the F.B.I.

His death is UNQUESTIONABLY the most important sidelight of the Oklahoma City bombing. Mike Loudenslager’s murder, most assuredly was one of the major factors leading to the demise of both Dr. H. Don Chumley and later Terry Yeakey!

For whatever reason, the Oklahoma City Police Dept. has always down-played Officer Terry Yeakey’s presence at the Murrah Building the morning of April 19, 1995, even though a large number of Oklahoma City police officers, firefighters, emergency personnel and survivors KNOW he played a much larger role in the early rescue-effort than he’s given credit for.

In an effort to cover up Mike Loudenslager’s murder and to intimidate others who were there early-on that morning, someone has taken out a number of internal witnesses. Dr. Don Chumley AND Terry Yeakey, both, besides being at the Murrah Building that morning, shared one other commonality. Each at the time of his “death” was attempting to deliver EVIDENCE concerning the fact Mike Loudenslager was alive and well AFTER the bombing, and also to get certain other facts out about the “bombing” as well.

In Terry Yeakey’s case he thought he was delivering evidence and information to a multi-county task force who would help get the truth out. That’s how he was set-up. In Dr. Chumley’s case, he was killed, some months earlier, when his personal jet aircraft “crashed” while attempting to do the same thing.

Were the deaths of Jack Colvert, Jackie Majors and Buddy Youngblood also directly related to the cover-up of Mike Loudenslager’s murder? Each of them had been at the Murrah Building that morning and each had also seen Mike Loudenslager ALIVE and well after the bombing.

Others who were there that morning have also felt threatened. Officer Gordon Martin, for one, feels at least two attempts on his life have been made. Other police officers and emergency services personnel fear for their personal safety as well. And while all this goes on, the moguls of the major-media remain silent! The so-called “fourth pillar of democracy” – the press – once again falls flat on its face, foresaking its sacred duty to REPORT THE NEWS. Remember, Hell is just as hot for those who go there for sins of OMISSION as those who go for sins of COMMISSION!.

Another interesting case of “suicide” in Oklahoma, since the bombing, is that of Kenneth Trentadue, who as the result of violating conditions of his parole in California, was re-incarcerated and sent to a federal (transfer) facility in Oklahoma. Mr. Trentadue, the brother of a prominent Salt Lake City, Utah attorney, supposedly committed suicide by hanging himself. But in actuality managed to commit a “suicide” very similar to TerryYeakey’s (minus the gunshot-wound-to-the-head). Only Kenneth Trentadue’s was committed with knotted or “braided” bedsheet, barely long enough to fit around his neck in a “suicide-proof” prison cell.

THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE later reported the trustees who cleaned Mr. Trentadue’s cell after his “suicide” found copious amounts of blood inside. This included bloody fingerprints up a wall, to within a few inches of a “panic button” on or near the ceiling. This certainly is not consistent with hanging.

When his family was contacted by prison officials and informed of his “suicide”, they were asked if they wanted his remains cremated. They indicated they did not, and after a very difficult time and much red-tape, the body was finally shipped back to them.

Being very skeptical as to a suicide, family members removed the mortuary make-up and were shocked to find part of his skull crushed, his knuckles damaged, bruises, puncture-and-slash-wounds over a good portion of his body (including the soles of his feet) and his throat slashed. Boot heel marks were apparent around the right eye and on his chest. All evidence points to the fact Kenneth Trentadue was subdued after a fight – brutally beaten, tortured and murdered!

(Update: THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE, Sat. July 11, 1998 – states M.E. says Trentadue death “suicide”!). This case is “supposedly” being looked into by U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch.

Former 7-term U.S. Rep. George Hansen of Idaho and his organization, The United States Citizens Human Rights Commission, IS, however, actively pursuing it.

Former Rep. Hansen was himself unjustly convicted and imprisoned and spent a number of years literally as a political prisoner in the federal penal system until his case was finally decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Many Americans who are familiar with the Trentadue case see a chilling similarity between Officer Terry Yeakey’s “suicide” and Kenneth Trentadue’s. Especially when each occurred in such close proximity to the other, in and around El Reno and Oklahoma City, AFTER the bombing.

Like Terry Yeakey, Kenneth Trentadue, (although smaller) was also a powerfully-built man. He lifted weights regularly, had a 19-inch neck and was a street-fighter with street savvy. In short, he knew how to take care of himself.

Many now wonder if Kenneth Trentadue might have had information regarding the Oklahoma City bombing, or its aftermath, that certain agents wanted him taken-out for. And many also wonder why a man re-incarcerated for violating his parole would REQUEST solitary confinement. What was Kenneth Trentadue afraid of?

Could the murder of Murrah Building G.S.A. employee Michael Loudenslager and the subsequent cover-up be the reason for (many of) the unresolved deaths in Oklahoma since the bombing? A growing number of Americans certainly think so.

 

Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: