Skip to content

Gay Rituals at Bohemian Grove – US Recognizes Al-Qaeda as Libya’s Govt. – Woman Arrested for Groping TSA – Police Shut Down Lemonade Stand

July 16, 2011

Alex Jones on gay rituals of Bohemian Grove

  • Print The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones' Facebook Infowars store

RT

Comment:  Nixon described Bohemian Grove as, “the most faggy GD thing you can ever imagine.”  Please click on the second video for the quote.  This is one way the elites gain power over leaders.  They encourage immorality, obtain proof of unspeakable acts done by an elected official, then use it should he stray from the agenda of the New World Order establishment.  This is also why morally compromised individuals are promoted in the political apparatus.

July 16, 2011

Forget about Bilderberg. America hosts its own top-secret pow-wow every summer in the woods of California, and some of the past participants at the all-male Bohemian Grove party have included presidents, foreign royalty and Hollywood elite. They are gathering right now for their two week adventure, and filmmaker Alex Jones says he once snuck his way onto the secret site.

—————————————————————————–

US Recognizes Al-Qaeda War Criminals As Libya’s Official Government

Unbelievable, though not unexpected, departure from reality.

Tony Cartalucci
Infowars.com
July 16, 2011

Associated Press reports that, “U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton says the Obama administration has decided to formally recognize Libya’s main opposition group as the country’s legitimate government. The move gives foes of Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi a major financial and credibility boost.”

In an act of utter desperation as the brutal, though entirely ineffective Libyan rebels flounder in their NATO-backed offensives against Libya’s ruling government in Tripoli, the US has now recognized the Libyan rebels as the country’s “legitimate government” allowing the US to directly fund, arm, and support with US troops, the Al-Qaeda tied war criminals operating out of Benghazi. The recent farcical move indicates that France’s Foreign Minister Alain Juppé has failed in his threats and posturing to get Libya’s Qaddafi to stand down, and that the NATO-backed war of aggression is about to reach new heights of brutality most likely including the involvement of US, UK, and French troops on the ground.

Libyan Rebels are Al-Qaeda – On Record

Operating out of the Libyan cities of Benghazi, Darna, and Tobruk, Libyan rebels themselves have admitted that many of their members are drawn from Al Qaeda. The London Telegraph has reported that Libyan rebel leader Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi had admitted many of his fighters had just returned from fighting US forces in Iraq. The Telegraph also reported that Hasidi himself had “earlier fought against “the foreign invasion” in Afghanistan, before being captured in 2002 in Peshwar, in Pakistan. He was later handed over to the US, and then held in Libya before being released in 2008.” A United States Army West Point report confirms indeed that fighters drawn from the Libyan cities of Benghazi, Darna, and Tobruk were second only to Saudi Arabia in contributing forces to fight US troops in Iraq.


Photo: According to US-educated Mahmoud Jibril, “prime minister” of the contrived “Libyan Transitional National Council,” in a May 12, 2011 talk before the Brookings Institution, “what’s taking place is a natural product of the globalizational process that started in the mid-80′s.” He most recently confirmed allegations reported by HRW regarding rebel atrocities but claimed they represent only a “few incidents” and that those responsible would be “brought to justice.”

This illustrates the absurdity of both the “War on Terror” and the current NATO-backed operations unfolding in Libya, where the same known terrorists are used both as an excuse for global intervention and continued foreign occupation while concurrently provided arms, air cover, legitimacy, and now direct funding while participating in global intervention. On full display for the world to see is how the global corporatocracy manipulates and exploits all sides of any given conflict for their own nefarious self-serving ends. One must wonder what races through the minds of US and UK pilots as they provide air support for the very men they strafed in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Libyan Rebels are Documented War Criminals

In an April 2011 New York Times article titled, “Inferior Arms Hobble Rebels in Libya War,” a weepy narrative is told of under-armed, outclassed rebels who have been compelled by their circumstances to commit horrific atrocities and war crimes. The New York Times describes a “tolerance for at least a small number of child soldiers,” and blamed a lack of command-and-control for “instances of abusive or outright brutal conduct” rather than a lack of ethical principles or their foreign-funded, illegitimate cause.

The New York Times article describes the rebels’ use of Grad rockets often described as indiscriminate war weapons and whose use by Qaddafi’s forces have been cited as a contributing factor for NATO’s intervention. The article also makes mention of the rebels’ use of landmines – also a contributing factor cited by the warmongering criminals of NATO for their intervention in North Africa.

More recently, the Soros-funded Human Rights Watch released a report indicating that civilians were being abused (including having their feet shot off by victorious rebels) and their property looted and destroyed by Libya’s rebels upon taking over towns from “suspected Qaddafi supporters.” While the report, and a torrent of corporate-owned media outlets attempt to play-down and spin the allegations confirmed by defacto rebel “prime minister” Mahmoud Jibril, they represent evidence indicating that Libya’s violence is not divided along political aspirations for “liberal democracy” and support for Qaddafi, but rather along predictable, long standing ethnic divisions. These confirmed reports of rebel war crimes also provide evidence that NATO’s involvement in Libya is justified by selective enforcement of an already illegitimate UN Security Council resolution for the sole purpose of removing Qaddafi – clearly not protecting Libyan civilians.

Libyan Intervention One of Imperialism, not Humanitarianism

Stated quite clearly in the corporate-funded, corporate-serving Brookings Institution’s piece titled, “Libya’s Test of the New International Order,” the intervention in Libya “is a test that the international community has to pass. Failure would shake further the faith of the people’s region in the emerging international order and the primacy of international law.” Indeed this intervention is about asserting international law above national sovereignty and upholding an “international order” described by globalist degenerate Robert Kagan, a chief proponent of the current war in Libya, as serving “the needs of the United States and its allies, which constructed it.”

This has absolutely nothing to do with democracy, human rights, or even the rule of law, international or otherwise. The same warmongering degenerate Robert Kagan who brazenly admits the “international order” serves American, not international interests, recently signed a letter to US House Republicans imploring them to disregard both the American people’s will as well as UN Security Council r.1973 in order to commit to full intervention in Libya on behalf of rebels admittedly members of Al-Qaeda who are committing a myriad of war crimes in support of this neo-imperial campaign. Kagan’s willingness to disregard even the contrived legalities authorizing NATO’s involvement in Libya in the first place illustrates the unchecked, arbitrary nature of this emerging “international order,” an order that feels it needs answer to no one.

It is imperative that people understand the true nature not only behind this intervention in Libya, but the “international order’s” involvement, meddling, and intervention throughout the world. Any thorough examination of the United States government, the unelected corporate-funded think tanks that produce its policy, the corporate-owned media outfits that promote their agendas, and the immense global network of foreign-funded NGOs, foundations, and organizations carrying the agenda out, reveals a self-serving oligarchy merely using attractive ideals to sell their otherwise unpalatable agenda. As the Romans and the British had foisted upon millions during the construction of their despotic world spanning empires, the United States and their global allies are now using the facade of “civil society,” “human rights,” “democracy,” and “freedom” to construct a new oligarchical global empire.

Tony Cartalucci is the editor and writer at Land Destroyer Report

———————————————————————————–

 Woman Arrested for Groping TSA Agent

Infowars.com
July 16, 2011

When the TSA gropes you, it is the government checking to see if you are with al-Qaeda, never mind the Fourth Amendment and sexual molestation. But when one of the plebs does it to a TSA goon, it is a criminal offense, as the woman below learned after she grabbed a TSA agent’s breast and squeezed:

http://www.myfoxny.com/video/videoplayer.swf?dppversion=10588

Woman Gropes TSA Agent’s Breast at Security Checkpoint: MyFoxNY.com

——————————————————————————-

Midway, Ga., Police Shut Down Kids’ Lemonade Stand

| Print |

 E-mail

Written by Jack Kenny  –   New American
Friday, 15 July 2011 17:40
Police in Midway, Georgia shut down a lemonade stand run by three girls trying to make money for a trip to a water park in Savannah because the youngsters didn’t have the license and permits required for their fledgling enterprise. City ordinances require a business license, a peddler’s permit, and a food permit for the vending of food or beverages, even on residential property in the small city (pop. approximately 1,100) just south of Savannah. The license and permits cost $50 a day or $180 a year, according to Coastal Source, a website of Savannah TV stations WJCL and WTGS.

So the girls shut down their stand and are doing yard work and other chores to make money.

“They told us to shut it down,” 10-year-old Skylar Roberts reported. “It’s kind of crazy that we couldn’t sell lemonade,” said Casity Dixon, 14. “It was fun, but we had to listen to the cops and shut it down.”

The stand had been operating just one day when the city’s police chief and a deputy drove by and spotted it. Police Chief Kelly Morningstar said it was simply a matter of enforcing the law.

“We were not aware of how the lemonade was made, who made the lemonade, of what the lemonade was made with, so we acted accordingly by city ordinance,” Morningstar said. “We had told them, we understand you guys are young, but still, you’re breaking the law, and we can’t let you do it anymore. The law is the law, and we have to be consistent with how we enforce the laws,” Morningstar said.

The news generated a number of responses on the website, most of them hostile to the police action.

“This is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard! ” one reader wrote in. “People who are supporting the actions of the officers are just as stupid as they are! I’m sure that the police were getting flooded with calls from the citizens of Midway about those kids running an illegal lemonade ring! I’m sure that the city council and the mayor told those officers, YOU GO SHUT THAT ILLEGAL LEMONADE STAND DOWN NOW OFFICERS! NOT!”

“‘The law is the law’… give me a freakin’ break! ” wrote another. “By the same token ‘a stupid law is a stupid law.’ … Besides, in order to abide by the law, the girls would have to sell 200 glasses of lemonade PER DAY just to pay for the permits.”

“This law cannot have been adopted to address illegal lemonade stands run by children.” another correspondent wrote. “I presume the town council intended to control adult run food establishments, not children’s lemonade stands.”

But at least one person wrote in to defend the police action: “I’m sorry that everyone thinks that is such a bad thing. The kids are over it and everyone else should get over it as well. If you don’t like it then go to the city council and have them ammend [sic] the law to allow exceptions — but there is nothing the police could do in this instance. This was a small issue and should have never been blown up. ”

The Freedom Center of Missouri has published on its website a long list of actions taken in recent years by police or other local officials against children selling cookies, cupcakes, or lemonade. Last August Bruce Walker wrote in The New American that health inspectors in Mutlnomah Country, Oregon, warned a seven-year-old of a potential $500 fine if she continued to sell lemonade without a license. Earlier this year Girl Scouts in Savannah, Georgia, were prohibited from continuing their decades-old practice of selling cookies in front of the childhood home of the organization’s founder, Juliet Gordon Low. After receiving a complaint, Randolph Scott, the city’s zoning administrator, investigated and discovered the Scouts were setting up a table on the city sidewalk in violation of a city ordinance.

“I know it doesn’t look good,” Scott told the Savannah Morning News. “However, other businesses won’t care if it’s the Girl Scouts or March of Dimes. They’re going to say, ‘Why can’t I sit out front and solicit business?'”

Last month parents of children selling lemonade near the US Open at the Congressional Country Club in Bethesda, Maryland, were fined $500 after their children ignored Montgomery County officials’ orders to stop.

“This gentleman from the county is now telling us because we don’t have a vendor’s license, the kids won’t be allowed to sell their lemonade,” Carrie Marriott, one of the parents involved, told WUSA of Washington, D.C.  “Does every kid who sells lemonade now have to register with the county?”

The youngsters were using the sales to raise money for research against pediatric cancer, but the size of their operation drew the attention of county officials. Jennifer Hughes, director of permitting for the county noted they were selling bottled drinks out of four large coolers under a 10 x 10 tent.

“This is not what you would see when you picture a typical lemonade stand,” Hughes said. Traffic and safety concerns about non-permitted vendors streaming into the area for the U.S. Open lay behind the decision, she said.

USA 9 reported on its website that the sellers included children of two “Washington power families, the Marriotts (hotels) and the Augustines (Lockheed-Martin).” The ban on the lemonade stand was lifted and the fine waived when the group agreed to move the operation 100 feet back from the corner at the intersection where it had been set up.

“This is not a big bad bureaucracy coming down on little kids,” Hughes said.

But not everyone was happy with the outcome. “This feels like a whole lot of government to me, ” said Rene Augustine.

———————————————————————————-

Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: